 |
Species Fact Sheet
| Ownership |
FAO - FIRM -
Species Identification and Data Programme FAO
Catalogues: Species of the World
 |
| CoverPage |
A world overview of species of interest to
fisheries. Sphyrna lewini
 | | |
| Sphyrna lewini (Griffith
& Smith, 1834) -
Sphyrnidae
|
|
|
See tree map
 | |
| Synonyms |
|
|
Zygaena malleus
Valenciennes, 1822, (in part). |
|
|
? Zygaena indica van
Hasselt, 1823. |
|
|
Cestracion leeuwenii
Day, 1865. |
|
|
Zygaena erythraea
Hemprich & Ehrenberg, 1899. |
|
|
Cestracion oceanica
Garman, 1913. |
|
|
Sphyrna diplana
Springer, 1941. | |
| FAO Names |
| En - Scalloped hammerhead, Fr -
Requin-marteau halicorne, Sp - Cornuda común. |
| 3Alpha Code: SPL Taxonomic Code:
1080300506 |
| Scientific Name
with Original Description |
| Zygaena lewini Griffith & Smith , in
Cuvier, Griffith & Smith,, 1834, Anim. Kingd., 10:
640, pl. 50. Holotype: unknown. Type Locality: South coast of
New Holland (Australia). |
| Diagnostic
Features |
fieldmarks: A large hammerhead with a broad,
narrow-bladed head, anterior margin of head very broadly
arched in adults and with a prominent median
indentation, teeth with moderately broad cusps and
smooth to weakly serrated edges, moderately falcate
first dorsal fin with origin over or behind pectoral
insertions and free rear tip in front of pelvic origins,
low second dorsal fin with weakly concave posterior
margin, long posterior margin about twice fin height,
and free rear tip nearly or quite reaching upper caudal
origin, non-falcate pelvic fins, a deeply notched
posterior anal margin, and dusky or black-tipped
pectoral fins.
| Expanded
prebranchial head hammer- or axe-shaped and very wide but
longitudinally narrow, its width 24 to 30% of total length
(mostly above 26%), distance from tip of snout to rear
insertions of posterior margins of expanded blades less than
half width of head; anterior margin of head very broadly
arched, with prominent medial and lateral indentations;
posterior margins of head long, angled posterolaterally, and
generally broader than mouth width. Well-developed prenarial
grooves present anteromedial to nostrils. Preoral snout about
1/5 to 1/3 of head width. Rear of eyes slightly anterior to
upper symphysis of mouth. Mouth rather broadly arched.
Anterior teeth with moderately long stout to slender cusps,
smooth or weakly serrated, posterior teeth mostly cuspidate
and not keeled and molariform. Pelvic fins not falcate,
with straight or slightly concave posterior margins. First
dorsal moderately falcate, origin above or slightly behind
pectoral insertions, free rear tip well anterior to pelvic
origins. Second dorsal fin low, less than anal height, with a
shallowly concave posterior margin; inner margin long, about
twice fin height, and ending almost opposite upper caudal
origin. Anal fin larger than second dorsal fin and rather
long, base 4.3 to 6.4% of total length, origin well ahead of
second dorsal origin, posterior margin shallowly concave to
nearly straight. Total vertebral centra 174 to 209. A
large hammerhead, to over 3 m. Colour gray-brown above,
white below, with dusky to black pectoral fin tips.
|
Additional information from
FishBase |
| Geographical
Distribution |
|
|
| Essentially circumglobal in coastal warm temperate and
tropical seas.Western Atlantic: New Jersey to Brazil,
including Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean. Eastern Atlantic from
? Mediterranean and Senegal to Zaire. Indo-West Pacific: South
Africa and Red Sea to Pakistan, India, Burma, Thailand,
Indonesia, China (including Taiwan Province), Japan, The
Philippines, Australia (Queensland, Western Australia), New
Caledonia. Central Pacific: Hawaii and Tahiti. Eastern
Pacific: Southern California and Gulf of California to Panama,
Ecuador and ? northern Peru. |
| Habitat and
Biology |
Probably the most abundant hammerhead, a
coastal-pelagic, semioceanic warm-temperate and
tropicalspecies occurring over continental and insular shelves
and in deep water adjacent to them, often approaching close
inshore and entering enclosed bays and estuaries. Ranges from
the intertidal and surface down to at least 275 m depth. Young
sharks primarily occur close inshore. Forms large true
polarized schools at different stages of its life-history,
though solitary individuals of both young and adults also
occur. This species is apparently highly mobile and in part
migratory, and forms huge schools of small migrating
individuals that move polewards in the summer in certain areas
such as off Natal, South Africa. Elsewhere, as in the East
China Sea, it may not migrate and is thought to form large
resident populations. Adult males and females may segregate
during certain phases of their life-cycle. Off southern Baja
California, in the Gulf of California, polarized schools of
scalloped hammerheads of mixed sexes with females
predominating and sizes from immatures of slightly less than a
meter to adults over 3 m have been intensely observed
underwater by A. Peter Klimley and Donald R. Nelson. These
congregate offshore over seamounts and near islands, and show
a considerable range of behaviours including lateral tilting
of the body (possibly to enhance the shark's view of divers
when approached from above and behind them); accelerated
swimming variants with headshaking, thrusting the midsection
while swimming rightside up or upside down, and corkscrew
swimming with rotation around their longitudinal axes; hitting
other hammerheads with their snouts; jaw opening; and clasper
flexion. Some of these displays may involve aggression or
courtship. Many females bear apparent courtship scars, but a
smaller proportion of males have them too. The function of
these schools is uncertain: reproduction is thought unlikely
because of the presence of juveniles in the schools; defence
unlikely because of the absence of possible predators on the
hammerheads; and grouping for attaining a swimming advantage
in the strong currents that are common in these places
unlikely because the sharks school when currents are absent.
Feeding advantages may occur for the sharks to cluster near
food resources or even for social feeding, but so far this is
hypothetical because the sharks have never been seen to feed
in the daytime when observations can be made though they may
do so at night. Sharks have been tracked and may wander off
from the schooling area. Viviparous, with a yolk-sac
placenta; number of young in a litter 15 to 31. Off Hawaii
adults move inshore in Kaneohne Bay, Oahu to drop young and
mate. The smallest young are found close inshore in the bay
but these move into deeper water as they grow, to eventually
depart for open water. The scalloped hammerhead
takes a wide variety of fish prey, but also invertebrates
(especially cephalopods ). Food items include sardines
and herring,
anchovies, ten-pounders (Elopidae), conger eels, milkfish, sea
catfish, silversides, halfbeaks, mullet,
lizardfish,
barracuda, bluefish,
spanish
mackerel, jacks,
porgies, mojarras, cardinal fishes, goatfish, grunts,
damselfishes, parrotfishes, wrasses, butterfly fishes,
surgeonfish, gobies, flatfish, sharpnose sharks
(Rhizoprionodon ), blacktip reef sharks, angel sharks,
stingrays, squid,
octopus,
cuttlefishes, sea snails, shrimp,
mantis shrimp, crabs,
lobsters
and isopods . |
Additional information from FishBase
|
| Size |
| Maximum total length about 370 to 420 cm, males maturing
at 140 to 165 cm and reaching at least 295 cm, females
maturing at about 212 cm and reaching at least 309 cm; size at
birth 42 to 55 cm. |
Additional information from
FishBase |
| Interest to
Fisheries |
| Global capture production
for Sphyrna lewini. (Fao Fishery Statistic) |
|
 |
|
 |
| This is probably
the commonest hammerhead in the tropics and is readily
available in abundance to inshore artisanal and small
commercial fisheries as well as offshore operations; it is
caught with pelagic longlines, fixed bottom longlines, fixed
bottom nets, and even bottom and pelagic trawls
; the young are easily caught on light longline
gear. Only 2 t of catches in 1994 and 12 t in both 1995 and
1996 have been reported to FAO for this species, all by
Guinea-Bissau in Eastern Central Atlantic (area 34). The total
catch reported for this species to FAO for 1999 was 10 t. The
countries with the largest catches were Guinea-Bissau (10
t). The meat is utilized fresh, fresh-frozen, dried salted
and smoked for human consumption; the fins are used to prepare
shark-fin soup base; the hides are prepared into leather; the
oil used for vitamins; and carcasses for
fishmeal.
Impact of fisheries Scalloped hammerhead
sharks are commonly taken in coastal fisheries around the
world. Because this species is known to form very large
aggregations, it is easy for fishermen to occasionally take
extremely large catches in a single fishing event. Purse
seiners have been reported to catch as much as 35 t of
scalloped hammerhead sharks in a single set (Stretta et
al. 1997). Pirate fishermen are known to take advantage of
the gregarious nature of scalloped hammerheads and illegally
fish large quantities of this species in the Galápagos Islands
Marine Reserve (Lavenberg et al. 1994, Camhi 1994). There are
virtually no catch statistics for this species throughout the
world, but Chen et al. (1988) report that off NE Taiwan
(Province of China) where this is the most commercially
important shark, at least 500 t/y were fished in the mid
1980s. Logbook data from the Atlantic US longline fisheries
(Cramer 1998) shows CPUE of hammerhead sharks (3 different
species, of which scalloped hammerhead sharks are likely the
major part) decreasing from about 2.7 sharks/1000 hooks in
1986 to 0.35 in 1997. Brown (1998) reports non-standardised
CPUE for unclassified hammerheads in the sport fishery off
Virginia-Massachusetts that show wide yearly variations with
an overall downward trend between 1986-97. However, scalloped
hammerhead sharks are poorly represented in this sport
fishery, as they tend to have a more southerly distribution.
Scalloped hammerheads are also under pressure from heavy
fishing in their nursery areas because these commonly occur in
shallow coastal waters where heavy fishing takes place. Large
quantities of newborns and juveniles of this species are taken
by fisheries in nursery areas in the Gulf of México (Bonfil
1997), Mauritania (Ducroq 1998), and probably elsewhere
throughout their range.
Conservation Status :
Smith et al. (1998) found that scalloped
hammerheads have one of the lowest intrinsic rebound
potentials among 26 shark species they analysed. This means
that fisheries for scalloped hammerheads should be conducted
under very tight management and monitoring to avoid stock
collapses. The worldwide distribution and known high abundance
of this shark offers a relative protection against the threat
of extinction, however the occurrence of local depletion is a
very real threat. Mooney-Seus and Stone (1996) consider
scalloped hammerhead sharks as Reduced in US Atlantic
waters and Data Deficient elsewhere.
Additional information from IUCN
database
Additional information from
CITESdatabase |
|
|
|
| Remarks |
Threat to humans: The scalloped hammerhead is
probably dangerous to people but this is uncertain because
until recently large hammerheads, particularly this species
and S. zygaena, have been regularly confused with each
other, and so several unprovoked and provoked attacks on
swimmers and divers as well as a few boat attacks can only be
attributed to 'hammerheads'. Under baited conditions these
hammerheads have made close approaches to divers but quickly
lost interest and departed when they apparently determined
that the divers were not the source of the food odour. In
ongoing studies on the social behaviour of these sharks off
seamounts in the Gulf of California A. Peter Klimley and
Donald R. Nelson (pers. comm.) have found large schools of
adult scalloped hammerheads to be rather timid and very
difficult to approach when they used SCUBA, so that much of
their work must be done by free-diving on the sharks to
measure, sex, tag, track with sonic tags, photograph, and
record their activities. These sharks are probably less
dangerous than the smaller but more aggressive gray reef shark
(Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos), much less the bull, tiger
and great white sharks.
|
| Source of
Information |
| FAO species catalogue Vol.4. Sharks of the
world. An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of Shark
Species Known to Date Part 2 - Carcharhiniformes.Compagno,
L.J.V. 1984. FAO Fish. Synop., (125) Vol.4, Part
2. |
| Related
links |
|
Check this species at
www.fishbase.org |
| Bibliography |
| - |
Bass, d'Aubrey & Kistnasamy, (1975)
|
| - |
Bigelow & Schroeder, (1948) |
| - |
Cadenat, (1957) |
| - |
Cadenat & Blache, (1981) |
| - |
Carvallo, (1967) |
| - |
Clarke, (1971) |
| - |
Compagno, (l979, 1982) |
| - |
Compagno & Vergara, (1978) |
| - |
Garrick & Schultz, (1963) |
| - |
Gilbert, (1967a,b) |
| - |
Kato, Springer & Wagner, (1967) |
| - |
Klimley, (1981) |
| - |
Klimley & Nelson, (1981) |
| - |
Nelson, (1981) |
| - |
Sadowsky, (1965, 1967) |
| - |
Taniuchi, (1974)
| | | |